Brandywell Stadium Development

General Derry City talk & News. The heart of Derry City Chat.
Post Reply
User avatar
Greengo
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 195
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:16 am

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by Greengo »

This was before the stand steelwork & founds went in

Image

Image

Image

I still think the wall round the showgrounds dog track is too close...

User avatar
Andy Bernard
Reserves
Reserves
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 11:18 am

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by Andy Bernard »

Good pictures. We are going to have one of the weirdest grounds in the world. A dog track behind a net, an artifical pitch and a tiny new modern stand. A mish mash of last minute planning. We should have got so much better

User avatar
johnm
Reserves
Reserves
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:39 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by johnm »

What has been planned for the space behind the brandywell road side?
Is the pitch moved toward the wall or is that area being turned into a terracing?

KEVK
First Team
First Team
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by KEVK »

johnm wrote:What has been planned for the space behind the brandywell road side?
Is the pitch moved toward the wall or is that area being turned into a terracing?
Nothing behind both nets.

As others have posted, it's going to be so dis-jointed and potentially embarrassing when it's finished.

shauna
First Team
First Team
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:46 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by shauna »

Andy Bernard wrote:Good pictures. We are going to have one of the weirdest grounds in the world. A dog track behind a net, an artifical pitch and a tiny new modern stand. A mish mash of last minute planning. We should have got so much better
Well said andy couldn't agree more, if they ever finish both sides of this new stand then it wont look as weird but until then the place will be crazy looking.

User avatar
Marty
First Team
First Team
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by Marty »

KEVK wrote:
johnm wrote:What has been planned for the space behind the brandywell roadside?
Is the pitch moved toward the wall or is that area being turned into a terracing?
Nothing behind both nets.

As others have posted, it's going to be so disjointed and potentially embarrassing when it's finished.
It's not perfect but considering what was there before it is much less of an 'embarrassment'.

User avatar
jordie
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:56 am

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by jordie »

new stand going up now.

shauna
First Team
First Team
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:46 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by shauna »

jordie wrote:new stand going up now.
Any pics

Dazzy
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:19 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by Dazzy »

The 101m x 64m pitch dimensions is for the training pitch at the Showgrounds.

Looking at the plans there is no dimensions for the 3G pitch, but it is bigger than the showgrounds by a few meters. It will have to be 105m x 68m for Cat 3.

stevebradley
Manager
Manager
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:46 am

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by stevebradley »

Marty wrote:
KEVK wrote:
johnm wrote:What has been planned for the space behind the brandywell roadside?
Is the pitch moved toward the wall or is that area being turned into a terracing?
Nothing behind both nets.

As others have posted, it's going to be so disjointed and potentially embarrassing when it's finished.
It's not perfect but considering what was there before it is much less of an 'embarrassment'.
But we shouldn't have to make do with something sh!t in Derry, just because it's a bit less sh!t than what we had before.

Belfast wouldn't have to deal with that sort of treatment. And nor would they accept it.

User avatar
MariborKev
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:21 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by MariborKev »

stevebradley wrote:Belfast wouldn't have to deal with that sort of treatment. And nor would they accept it.
Yeah, but Belfast would undoubtedly have set up a properly resourced/focused lobby group for this.

We bumbled along, as with most things.

stevebradley
Manager
Manager
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:46 am

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by stevebradley »

MariborKev wrote:
stevebradley wrote:Belfast wouldn't have to deal with that sort of treatment. And nor would they accept it.
Yeah, but Belfast would undoubtedly have set up a properly resourced/focused lobby group for this.

We bumbled along, as with most things.
True.

Though never mind a lobby group - responsibility re the stadium we're getting rests largely with the Board IMO. They set their sights very low from early on, let themselves be led by the nose to an even more basic solution, and have blanked any criticism ever since. The 'new' Brandywell will be a monument to a paucity of ambition.

Wait til we all see what Glentoran eventually get.

paul60
Reserves
Reserves
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:01 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by paul60 »

stevebradley wrote:
MariborKev wrote:
stevebradley wrote:Belfast wouldn't have to deal with that sort of treatment. And nor would they accept it.
Yeah, but Belfast would undoubtedly have set up a properly resourced/focused lobby group for this.

We bumbled along, as with most things.
True.

Though never mind a lobby group - responsibility re the stadium we're getting rests largely with the Board IMO. They set their sights very low from early on, let themselves be led by the nose to an even more basic solution, and have blanked any criticism ever since. The 'new' Brandywell will be a monument to a paucity of ambition.

Wait til we all see what Glentoran eventually get.
The council are the owners who decide what amenity is fit for the general population here. If we were having the large crowds of yesteryear they would not be long in producing what was suitable to voters and lobbying the relevant funders to cough up. As the crowds dwindled the council put the brandywell on the pending list. Not enough voters put pressure on the photogenic councillors to make that difference.

micdaflic
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:38 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by micdaflic »

Glens complained very recently that Stormont collapse has scuppered any money being allotted and this applies to us too

fish-head
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by fish-head »

stevebradley wrote:
MariborKev wrote:
stevebradley wrote:Belfast wouldn't have to deal with that sort of treatment. And nor would they accept it.
Yeah, but Belfast would undoubtedly have set up a properly resourced/focused lobby group for this.

We bumbled along, as with most things.
True.

Though never mind a lobby group - responsibility re the stadium we're getting rests largely with the Board IMO. They set their sights very low from early on, let themselves be led by the nose to an even more basic solution, and have blanked any criticism ever since. The 'new' Brandywell will be a monument to a paucity of ambition.

Wait til we all see what Glentoran eventually get.
i think steve that if you ask the board, they'll say that they had the ambition but the problem was the money which was largely out of their hands. we can't expect phil to stump up the sort of money needed to build the finished article.

shauna
First Team
First Team
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:46 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by shauna »


KEVK
First Team
First Team
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by KEVK »

Without a dog track, they should chop the wings off the Southend Park Stand and use the seats for something directly behind the nets.

Just can't see the Southend Park Stand looking right with a scaled down pitch area in front of it.

shauna
First Team
First Team
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:46 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by shauna »

KEVK wrote:Without a dog track, they should chop the wings off the Southend Park Stand and use the seats for something directly behind the nets.

Just can't see the Southend Park Stand looking right with a scaled down pitch area in front of it.
That's exactly what i was thinking the wings of the southend park stand will look totally out of proportion compared to the rest of the ground so should be removed.

fish-head
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by fish-head »

shauna wrote:
KEVK wrote:Without a dog track, they should chop the wings off the Southend Park Stand and use the seats for something directly behind the nets.

Just can't see the Southend Park Stand looking right with a scaled down pitch area in front of it.
That's exactly what i was thinking the wings of the southend park stand will look totally out of proportion compared to the rest of the ground so should be removed.
naw they won't, they'll look grand as they are. it'll end up looking more of a pigs ear ffs
it's not like a box of lego you know.

shauna
First Team
First Team
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:46 pm

Re: Brandywell Stadium Development

Post by shauna »

fish-head wrote:
shauna wrote:
KEVK wrote:Without a dog track, they should chop the wings off the Southend Park Stand and use the seats for something directly behind the nets.

Just can't see the Southend Park Stand looking right with a scaled down pitch area in front of it.
That's exactly what i was thinking the wings of the southend park stand will look totally out of proportion compared to the rest of the ground so should be removed.
naw they won't, they'll look grand as they are. it'll end up looking more of a pigs ear ffs
it's not like a box of lego you know.
There is none of that ground that will look grand, and talking about lego sure its a lego size stand we are getting on the lone more road side.

Post Reply